What is the use of fertilizers in Pakistan?

9 min read

Following up on our broad discussion on soils, we will now focus on the use of fertilizers in Pakistan. Last time, we discussed Soil Organic Matter (SOM), salinity and alkalinity amongst other items seen in a farmer’s soil test. Now, we will take that knowledge and understand soil nutrition in the country. In this discussion, our average reader interested in finance will be able to connect the business of highly traded companies in stock exchanges like EFERT and FFBL to the theoretical and practical realities of soil science.


Fertilizers in Pakistan and their impact of agricultural productivity.
Macronutrients and Micronutrients

Every crop needs macronutrients and micronutrients to grow. The primary macronutrients have their individual importance in simple terms:-

Nitrogen (N): Vegetative growth

Phosphorous (P): Flowering, fruit and root growth

Potassium (K): Overall health and growth.

Furthermore, there are three secondary macronutrients needed for growth:

Sulphur (S): Chlorophyll production, seed formation and plant hardiness

Calcium (Ca): Cell wall formation and resistance to disease and environmental stress

Magnesium (Mg): Chlorophyll production for healthy leaf tissue

Lastly, there are various micronutrients also required by the plant. The deficiencies most studied and highlighted in Pakistan are Zinc and Boron deficiencies. However, deficiencies of other micronutrients such as iron, copper, manganese and molybdenum also exist.

Fertilizers in Pakistan

Fertilizers are inputs purchased by farmers to add nutrition or change properties of the soil. If you come across a fertilizer bag, the most visible thing on the bag after the brand name are three numbers.

These three numbers refer to the ratio of the three primary macronutrients, N – P – K, in the bag. For example, 18:46:0 is the formula for Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP), the second most common fertilizer used in Pakistan. This means that it contains 18% N, 46% P and 0% K (Potassium colloquially referred to as Potash), measured by the composition of the forms that are uptakeable by the plant: Phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5) for P and Potassium Oxide (K2O) for K.

In Pakistan, farmers predominantly use Urea (46:0:0) and DAP (18:46:0). There is a general under application of Potash (K) fertilizers leading to crop yields far lower than the potential.

Discussion of nutrients required by crops, usage of fertilizers in Pakistan and their impact of agricultural productivity.


Relative usage of NPK fertilizers in Punjab by district (kg/acre)
While all farmers invariably use Nitrogen and Phosphorous, Potash usage is negligible

Source: FAO Pakistan


The Nitrogen (N) in Urea and DAP is provided by ammonia, a raw material derived from natural gas. Since natural gas is readily available from our indigenous deposits in Sui, connections to large fertilizer companies are provided at a subsidized rate. The fertilizer sector is the third largest consumer of Pakistan’s natural gas, tied with residential gas consumption at 21% of total supply.

Agronomic Subtleties

Before discussing fertilizers in Pakistan in more detail, it is important to first explore soil nutrition. There is no publically available data on nutrient deficiencies in the country. Based on dated estimates from the FAO, almost all our soils are naturally Nitrogen deficient, more than 9% of soils have inadequate soil Phosphorus and up to 40% of soils are deficient in Potash.

With respect to secondary macronutrients, it is a common myth that calcium and magnesium deficiencies do not exist in Pakistan. While calcium and magnesium are present in large amounts, they exist in the form of calcium carbonates and magnesium carbonates that are not readily uptakeable by crops.

The average farmer may not even know that Urea is a source of Nitrogen or DAP is a source of Phosphorus. They purchase inputs pushed by their Aarti – informal agents who purchase a farmer’s harvest and give inputs on credit against it. Frequently, these inputs are traditional N-P fertilizers such as Urea and DAP.

The informed farmer looks at the analysis of the product, which refers to its nutrient composition and tries to place a value on it. Certain products have elements that are not readily uptakeable by the plant, while others have high salt content that is toxic to some crops like tobacco. There are many factors to consider and without the requisite knowledge, average farmers invariably have lower yields.

Sources of Fertilizer Material

We discussed earlier how Urea and DAP use indigenous natural gas to produce nitrogenous fertilizers. Urea is usually not allowed or feasible to import into the country. The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the Federal Cabinet decides import of Urea during shortages. Another fertilizer that uses gas in Pakistan is Calcium Ammonium Nitrate. Due to Ammonium Nitrate’s use as a potential explosive, it is not easily available in some areas of the country such as KPK.

Although we have local phosphate deposits such as the famous Hazara Phosphate, phosphate rock does not make for a good fertilizer. For it to be effective, it requires being converted into phosphoric acid. As a result, the only major producer of DAP, Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim (FFBL), sources its phosphorus from its joint venture with the OCP group in Morocco. A large amount of DAP is imported into the country to meet Pakistan’s requirements.

Potash fertilizers such as Muriate of Potash (MOP) and Sulphate of Potash (SOP) are mostly imported as we do not have any potash deposits. SOP can be produced from MOP using the Mannheim process. MOP is imported commonly from countries such as Belarus. Both can also be combined with NP fertilizers to make NPK blends.

Nutrient Wise Offtake

Net Nutrient Offtake in Pakistan (tonnes)

Potash offtake in Pakistan is far below that of other major nutrients

Source: National Fertilizer Development Corporation (NFDC)


It is easy to observe that our Potash offtake is far below our N and P offtake, making Pakistan lose on potential crop output. In regional terms, India consumes approximately 4 million tonnes of Potash, roughly 40 times the amount consumed by Pakistan. Adjusted for population, India consumes almost ten times more than the country.

There are three main reasons for this under application:

  • Potash is usually the ‘third bag’ and left out in the absence of input finances
  • Rising input costs since imported Potash is linked to rupee devaluation
  • Lack of awareness on Potash and crop NPK requirements

Potential for Yield Increases

We have already started discussing the under application of Potash (K). But what exactly is the value proposition it offers to the farmer if they decide to hypothetically spend on the ‘third bag’.

A study conducted across Sindh and Punjab in 2015, found that the use of potassium and micronutrients, alone or with farmyard manure, in addition to the typical NP fertilizers, improved crop yields. Yields for sugarcane increased by over 60% in some cases when NPK fertilizers, micronutrients and manure were used as compared to when just Urea (N). Lack of proper fertilization partly explains why crop yields in Pakistan have consistently lagged other countries.


Sugarcane yield in Sindh and Punjab by nutrients provided (maunds/acre)

Use of potash along with other nutrients achieves optimal crop productivity

Source: Soil Fertility Atlas (FAO and Fauji Fertilizers)


Usually, aside from improvements in the quality of produce, the increase in yield usually offsets the initial cost of investment if Potash (K) is applied. This is calculated by the Value Cost Ratio (VCR) of a fertilizer. This is not restricted to macronutrients. Studies by the Pakistan Agriculture Research Council (PARC) have shown that micronutrients such as Zinc and Boron can give a VCR of 10:1 to 25:1, showing incredible promise.

Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)

Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) is the fraction of applied nitrogen that is absorbed and used by the plant. Despite having one of the highest per hectare application of nitrogen, Pakistan has one of the lowest NUE ratios and average yields globally.

Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) for Cotton crop across countries

Pakistan uses highest amount of nitrogen with the least efficiency in cotton crops

N inputs (kg N/ha)

Mean crop yield (kg/ha) 

NUE (yield/N inputs)

N inputs (kg N/ha)

Mean crop yield (kg/ha)

NUE (yield/N inputs)

Source: Nature Sustainability Volume 2


We over apply nitrogen due to the low cost of Urea compared to other fertilizers. Nitrogenous fertilizers give a relatively quick response in the form of visible greenery from vegetative growth. However, this green effect can be deceptive and does not necessarily imply a healthy crop or a high yield. Therefore, farmers untrained in scientifically assessing their productivity rely on this faulty intuition.

Government Policy: Beyond the Urea & DAP Paradigm

Forward thinking governance would immediately recognize that poor yields correlate with poor NUE. Conventional fertilization traditions in Pakistan hinder farmer’s financial prosperity in the short term and threaten food security in the long term. This would require resisting lobbying from rent seeking corporates that depend on gas rate concessions. A national alignment with global movements towards sustainability and nutrient management can easily ensue. A part of efficient use of fertilizers in Pakistan includes balanced fertilization including Potash (K) use.

Potash consumption directly benefits from microfinance schemes that finance inputs, allowing them to invest in the ‘third bag’ after their N & P fertilizers. A straightforward way to increase potash consumption would be to provide a subsidy to the farmer. This can be through supply side exemptions of taxes, levies and import finance. Cash reimbursements such as the scheme spearheaded by the Government of Punjab in the Potash Subsidy Scheme 2018-19 are also possible. Due to poor financial literacy, many farmers have been unable to avail the scheme.

However, subsidies are usually an unimaginative way to deal with problems that require sustainable solutions. The government can promote slow release fertilizers so that nitrogen is supplied throughout the crop cycle. The Indian government scheme to compel domestic producers of Urea to coat their product with Neem Oil is an example.

Policy focus should go from increasing fertilizer use volume to efficient nutrient management. Simple examples are:

  • Promote compound NPK fertilizers that contain N in proper ratios.
  • Awareness of growing legumes in crop rotations that fix atmospheric nitrogen.
  • Promote use of biofertilizers that contain microbes that help uptake nutrients.
  • Introducing Urease Inhibitors to slow nitrogen cycle, increasing available N.

Private Sector Participation

Most of our discussion has been focused on recommendations for government policy and awareness campaigns. However, most fertilizers are marketed and distributed by the private sector. The government should ease the interaction between progressive farmers and innovative agriculture firms. It can provide cheap and readily accessible testing facilities so farmers can analyze and verify new products easily. This would remove the default suspicion of milawat (adulteration) that precedes interaction between parties.

Within the private sector itself, improvements in distribution will inevitably emerge themselves. Taking advantage of Pakistan’s high mobile penetration and mobile wallet use, future e-commerce platforms can provide access to a larger product range including innovative fertilizers. Next time, we will talk more about farming innovations and non-fertilizer inputs such as high-yield variety seeds and pesticide.

Umer Vakil

Umer Vakil is a director at a commodity trading firm focusing on forest products. The firm has recently developed an agribusiness division in Pakistan. Before his current role, he was an analyst in the financial services sector in Los Angeles, USA. He has a B.A. in Mathematics from New York University.

One Comment

  1. Dear Sir

    Our Farmer does not has update on utilization of fertilizers. It is just one person told him use this and use that otherwise their knowledge about utilization of Fertilizer is very limited. They know only DAP and UREA Other then that they do not know.
    Our Government Agricultural Department personnel should teach them about every latest advantage/Disadvantages of each kindly of Fertilizer and how to use. For such They should establish some seminar, NOT IN BIG CITIES BUT TWONS AND VILLAGES WHERE SUCH AGRICULTURE IS GOING ON. Our big bosses do not like to go our of their offices and just make policies which are good for the books but not practical.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button